1707 - ACT OF UNION
The Act of Union that created the United Kingdom of Great Britain

The new 1707 union flag, first used at sea in 1606

The year 1707 was a major crossroads in Scottish history, the year when two often warring nations became one. Since 1603, Scotland and England had shared a monarch yet remained separate political entities. The union of Scotland and England that gave birth to the concept of Great Britain and the United Kingdom was inspired by politics and commerce, yet was deeply unpopular with the Scottish people as a whole.

Most ordinary Scots saw the Union as a betrayal of such illustrious forebears as William Wallace and Robert the Bruce, who had fought and died for a free Scotland, independent of England. Many also saw it as a cynical betrayal of the great Declaration of Arbroath, signed in 1320 and which was also given support by the Pope in Rome.

Perhaps the most famous section of the Declaration runs as follows:

"For so long as a hundred of us remain alive, we will yield in no least way to English dominion. For we fight, not for glory nor for riches nor for honour, but only and alone for Freedom, which no good man surrenders but with his life".

Formal recognition of Scotland’s independence was not given by the English crown straight away however. That had to wait until 1328, with the signing of the Treaty of Edinburgh between Robert the Bruce of Scotland and King Edward III of England. This treaty was sealed by the marriage of Robert the Bruce’s son David to Joanna, the daughter of Edward the III.

So important was the Declaration of Arbroath, that the Declaration of Independence by the United States of America was inspired and partially based upon it, as can be justly argued, was the Unilateral Declaration of Independence by Rhodesia in 1965. There is also a special resonance in that case, given that the parents of the Rhodesian leader, Ian Douglas Smith, were from Scotland.

The Union of 1707 swept away Scottish independence with the stroke of a pen and to the great mass of Scottish people, insulted the memory and made meaningless the sacrifices of so many Scots, who had fought and died for Scottish independence over the long hard years of struggle with England.

The 18th century could be seen as the beginning of the modern age, the deceitful politics certainly do not seem to have changed over the centuries. Capitalism was on the cusp of its rapid rise during the Industrial Revolution, where money would be king and ordinary people would be nothing more than commodities and the fodder of profit for the wealthy elite.

It has been said that the callous and horrific evictions of both the lowland and highland clearances provided the labour for the growing industrial towns of Scotland, as the poor people of the clans were swept from their ancestral lands by greedy and unfeeling landowners, who were often the clan chiefs of those so cruelly evicted and left destitute. The Union meant nothing to the abused and downtrodden of Scotland.

At the beginning of the 18th century two converging issues of national importance to both Scotland and England finally came together. Queen Anne of England was ailing and had produced no living heir to the Kingdom. This would open the way for a claim to the throne of both England and Scotland by the exiled Stuart dynasty, who were watchfully biding their time in France. The English parliament did not want the nightmare scenario of a return of the Catholic Stuarts with their notions of ruling by divine right from God.

The Presbyterian Scots did not want a Catholic on the throne either but more importantly, Scottish commercial interests wanted access to England’s colonial possessions in North America to boost their weak and stagnant economy. After many deliberations, meetings, bribes and concessions from England, the Scottish parliament voted itself out of existence to the great dismay of the ordinary people of Scotland. A proud nation had been bought and sold by a cabal of nobles and businessmen, who all did very well out of the deal.

So aggrieved by the situation were the people of Scotland, that they took to wearing items of tartan as a protest at what they saw as an almost treasonable act. Even well-to-do people in Edinburgh took to wearing tartan, which firmly established it as a symbol of protest and rebellion. This culminated in its overwhelming use by the rebel Jacobite forces of Bonnie Prince Charlie in 1745, and its subsequent banning by the British government for over thirty years, after the Jacobite defeat at Culloden in 1746.

Even today, tartan is seen as a vitally important national symbol of Scotland, as witnessed by the establishment of an official Scottish Register of Tartans in 2008. To many people, tartan is the very essence of Scotland itself but tartan has also become a unifying symbol for all the Celtic nations. The Cornish, the Welsh, the Manx, the Irish, the Bretons, they all have their own tartans.

In the long term Scotland’s political, commercial and financial concerns did benefit from the Union as the British Empire was established and so did England’s, especially in respect to North Sea oil and its gushing stream of tax revenues. Who is to say what the situation of both nations would have been today without the Union of 1707? maybe it would have been better or perhaps worse? That point will be argued back and forth endlessly as it has always been.

There is a new sense of national pride and identity arising in Scotland today, the re-establishment of an independent Scottish parliament in 1999 being representative of that rising sense of distinct nationhood at the beginning of the new millennium. Whether or not Scots have a taste for full independence has yet to be seen but there may yet be a new standard symbolically planted at Glenfinnan. ‘Will ye no come back again?’ may not now apply to Bonnie Prince Charlie, but it could certainly apply to a new sovereign nation of Scotland.

Return to Top

©Copyright - James of Glencarr